By: Nuthead

Nuthead
Fri, 24 Oct 2014 06:17:53 +0000

Out of the Box - If this is such a cut and dry non-contract employee issue then why is there a need to constantly libel thousands of alumni and students in order to justify this simple claim? If he truly did something wrong, why did it take so much hard work to fire him? Apparently, you need a report that lists a mountain of circumstantial evidence, paraphrases hearsay about decades of shenanigans from others, invents the term "sexualized culture" and attaches all of this to the largest and most successful co-ed performance-based organization on campus. As far as I know, spice is generally used to enhance or cover-up a flavor. So which is it? Seems like the University has been throwing in a lot of "spicy details" since the Glaros Report. Pay no attention to the University Administration behind the curtain. Also, you may want to stop defending your legal team on these blog posts…the "third allegation of sexual assault" (item "a") clearly doesn't mention who the assault was reported to...I guess we are just suppose to make assumptions on our own…no, that's you telling us right here that Mr. Waters was directly involved…seems legit. Also, I'm pretty sure that the second allegation that involved athletic band students (item "b") also involved Mr. Waters reporting this assault to Gene Smith… but strangely this is not cited…oh wait, he is a contract employee…