By: Danielle

Danielle
Wed, 26 Nov 2014 22:28:33 +0000

The arrogance of this article, and many like it, is astounding. Being unarmed does not preclude someone from being a threat. The officer should have just let Brown pummel him, take his gun and kill him? He had every right to defend his life. We may never know if officer Wilton's version of events matches what really happened but forensic evidence backs it up. And a jury looked over the evidence for months and found the evidence insufficient to indict him. We weren't there and it's pretty arrogant to act like we somehow know better than the men and women who took months from their lives to review and deliberate on the facts of the case.