By: Mike

Mike
Thu, 17 Nov 2016 03:41:40 +0000

In reply to Dr" target="_blank" title="/2016/11/protester-tackled-at-anti-trump-rally-working-to-drop-the-charges/comment-page-1/#comment-100797">Dr">/2016/11/protester-tackled-at-anti-trump-rally-working-to-drop-the-charges/comment-page-1/#comment-100797">Dr BobR. Bob -- Thank you for confirming your comprehension problem. You addressed virtually none of the points in my post, choosing instead to focus on "all" vs. "some" as if this was your big "gotcha" moment. For the record, I wasn't responding specifically to anything you posted, but rather to the general tone and content of many posts in this thread -- some of which did indeed say "all." So perhaps you need to get over yourself. I ignored Stanton being a registered Democrat because I found this of far less relevance to the story than the fact that he has Aspberger's Syndrome, and which many have noted (and YOU have ignored) is a rational explanation for his actions. But because it suits your world view so well, you find the notion of this incident being staged to be more attractive. Says a lot about you. Now I'd like to ask you what exactly your clever "We won. You lost. Get over it" has to do with this story...or anything else for that matter. Are you saying that those who did not favor a Trump presidency are to just shut up and go away now? We're no longer permitted to comment on ongoing events as they unfold...is that it? Please be clear on what you meant by this statement. Perhaps we can clarify your answer by turning it around and asking you whether, should Clinton have won the presidency instead, you would have immediate ceased any and all online commenting. Please be honest with your answer -- that is, if you have it in you.