By: a concerned buckeye

a concerned buckeye
Thu, 08 Mar 2018 15:26:36 +0000

1. Brooks Bros seem like they would absolutely oppose initiatives that may raise tuition costs or cause some kind of unnecessary headache. That’s a point in my book.

2. Ohio State students’ decisions should be given weight based on how much tuition they are paying, like a business. This allows the university to more effectively benefit the people who are actually supporting it financially.

3. Shamina and Shawn’s platform is very much: make things more affordable by getting rid of fees and things, but drive up costs by creating new initiatives and expanding existing ones. Which one is it? The costs get passed on somehow, mostly to the students who don’t get scholarships and to out-of-state students. If we aren’t paying fees, it will end up raising tuition or costs somewhere else. All of these policies sound nice and fair, and we should absolutely do any of these things which cost very little, but when we create new costly initiatives we can’t in the same breath be talking about reducing cost of attendance.