By: Ellen Maas

Ellen Maas
Tue, 29 Oct 2019 17:30:34 +0000

In reply to gsdgobucks.” target=”_blank” title=”/2019/10/hire-of-former-trump-epa-administrator-raises-student-concerns/comment-page-1/#comment-112632″>gsdgobucks.”>/2019/10/hire-of-former-trump-epa-administrator-raises-student-concerns/comment-page-1/#comment-112632″>gsdgobucks.

I cannot agree there is any moral high ground in playing with the health of large populations of people just to argue about the science and benefit corporations who have substantially more resources to handle their own hardships with. Even if the science was weak (which I strongly doubt) it is better to err on the side of cleaner air for everyone to breathe, including the employees of the companies generating the pollution, while the science continues to evolve and prove itself.