By: Stephan Conaway

Stephan Conaway
Thu, 07 Nov 2019 18:26:01 +0000

Apples and Oranges comparisons here. One is the statement of deforestation to create crop land for agriculture with a net permanent loss of forest cover. Two is the argument that managed forests with fast growing trees may capture more carbon than un-managed forests.

Either the research is random (doubtful) or the summarisation given here didn’t capture the actual findings. In any case, anyone who believes that climate change isn’t real and dangerous for us all, or that the burning of the Amazon Central Forest to create farm land isn’t a problem just isn’t reading the runes.